Week 24- Academically speaking (theory to practice, social justice, and inclusion) Enjoyment seeking (Dining out, kizomba, and jazz)
Hector Pieterson being carried by Mbuyisa Makhubo after being shot by South African police during a student protest in Soweto |
On June 16,
1000s of students began a march at Orlando Stadium (teachers did not condone
the march, but also did not interfere with the progress of the marchers). The
Soweto Students’ Representative Council’s Action Committee had organized the
protest and they had practiced discipline and peaceful protest skills prior to
the day.
The police
barricaded the road, the crowd was reminded not to provoke the police and
changed their route. The numbers increased from 3,000 to 10,000 students
chanting and singing as they marched, “Down with Afrikaans” and “Viva Azania.”
Exactly how
it started is disputed, however, most say the police may have been hit by a rock
or bottle and some began to shoot. Hector Pieterson was shot and killed. By the
end of the day, 22 others lost their lives (including 2 white people).
June 17 was
Youth Day Observed, a public holiday, so a group of people from the ex-patriot
group, InterNations, got together for brunch. Having the extra day to prepare
before working on my reports for the Fulbright was a nice reward. I was able to
organize my documents and presentations so I could begin looking for more
themes. Two major elements that seemed to present themselves include bringing
theory to practice and what inclusive practice and social justice mean in a classroom
with diverse learners. I noticed when I first began interviewing educators, almost
everyone was able to identify scaffolding and differentiation, yet when I asked
for examples, the room would get quiet. At the university level I offered to put
together a plan for introducing research and research-based practices beginning
with the first year students so that by fourth year (and beyond) they weren’t
intimidated. I ended up giving my materials to both University of the Western
Cape and University of Johannesburg.
As I have mentioned before, I worked
closely with the fourth years on a research project, which was a start, but I
realized this was their first exposure to reading research (and many found it
very difficult, they even expressed feelings of animosity toward me for
changing their program). The fourth years struggled with the research component
(finding articles), reading at the academic level, deciding whether the article
was relevant, and synthesizing the information without plagiarism. My proposal for
the university is to start with the research in the first year by explicitly
teaching the students about the elements of journals and how to “dissect” the
article based on common information (citation, introduction, statement of the
problem, purpose, research questions, methodology, results, and
discussion/limitation). By second year, the students should be able to dissect
an article they find of interest and decide if it is relevant to their
classroom (critique). Third year students can begin the researching process
using databases, the library, and other resources while fine-tuning their
writing without plagiarism. Finally, fourth year student would be ready to
choose a topic, find relevant articles, design a small study, and write a
research paper about a research-based practice.
From the feedback I received from the fourth year students, they wished they had been exposed to research earlier, they finally saw the connection between theories and research-based practices, and they felt more equipped to deal with “unsolvable” problems in their classroom. Many said they were going to apply for honors and masters classes because they had more confidence in their abilities. Over the six months I was at UJ, I watched the students academic writing skills increase as well by reading research. The students were able to identify how well written (and not so well written) an article was, which gave them guideline, modeling, and examples of clarity and detailed supports. This brings me back to my youngest sister who had me read a paper of hers (while she was getting her masters) and when I asked her about the structure she said no one every told her about any structure…I think as academics, we become so used to how articles are set up that we forget to break down the process and show parallels for our students.
The schools were also struggling with research-based practices. They were so used to using their own practices that many of the teachers refused to read the handouts I provided at professional developments because they had “filled” up the paper with their own interventions. Don’t get me wrong, it is great that they have so many “tricks” but I think it is imperative that we push ourselves as educators to learn more, try different strategies, and continue growing. It was reported to me more than once that the schools who did receive training on inclusion were given broad definitions and theoretical perspectives rather than practical examples and tools to use in their classrooms.
Which brings me to my next piece-
social justice and inclusive practices. Both at the university and schools
educators want to know how to identify, assess, and meet the needs of diverse
learners. University lecturers and professors point to the educational
psychology department and say, “they take care of that.” Preservice teachers
going into schools say, we “weren’t taught that.” And current teachers say, “we
haven’t been trained, we need more training, we aren’t qualified, a
psychologist needs to come and assess the learner, the district is supposed to
give us a training…” So, where to start?
I need to remind my select readers
(yes, I appreciate every ONE of you who actually reads what I write), that I
have only been here 6 months at this time and of course I don’t think I know
everything, nor do I believe I have the solution…what I have is some tools that
may work on some days; some research that I have tediously done; some
experience working with students with diverse needs; and a lot of care and love
for all students who want to learn and those who haven’t figured out they want
to learn yet. Okay, now I will continue...
I recommended to the university
that all lecturers and professors address diverse learning needs in all of
their classes (that is what inclusion is all about, right?). Even if it is just
a quick demonstration (with examples) on how a teacher would address diverse
learning needs based on the topic they presented in a unit. I recommended the
lecturers promote the inclusive ideas in their classes. I outline these 7-steps
that I believe can be applied to almost every situation: 1. beginning with
strengths, 2. then identify challenges, 3. make a plan for assessing the skill,
4. coming up with a few possible interventions, 5. implement the intervention,
6. reflect on the success, and 7. make adjustments as needed.
My thought is that, if lecturer in teacher education became
promoters (yes, I said
promoters) of inclusion, then preservice teachers would be
more exposed (and not just on a theoretical basis) to how it works beyond a
professional coming into the classroom and diagnosing the problem. Also, if the
teacher training programs scaffolded learning for these incoming high school
graduates (who often do not have the skills to succeed at university), then
they would actually be developing students and modeling their practice.
The first year students are coming in without study skills, academic writing, how to collaborate (ie, working in groups with people who you don’t know), self-advocate, ask for help, where to get support (writing center, psychological services, peers, etc), what to do if there are language issues (before an assignment is due), and problem solve (much like we have to teach our students everyday). Then, if the university taught interventions such as strategies based on brain development research, response to intervention (RtI), positive behavior intervention strategies (PBIS), and sheltered instruction observation protocol model (SIOP) then the preservice teachers would leave university with more interventions.
The first year students are coming in without study skills, academic writing, how to collaborate (ie, working in groups with people who you don’t know), self-advocate, ask for help, where to get support (writing center, psychological services, peers, etc), what to do if there are language issues (before an assignment is due), and problem solve (much like we have to teach our students everyday). Then, if the university taught interventions such as strategies based on brain development research, response to intervention (RtI), positive behavior intervention strategies (PBIS), and sheltered instruction observation protocol model (SIOP) then the preservice teachers would leave university with more interventions.
In schools,
teachers report parents don’t want their kids assessed because of the stigma
that goes along with having diverse learning needs. They believe the community
and families have to change the way they see students who need additional help.
Also, they point to the various social and health issues their learners walk in
the door with- abuse, poverty, crime, non-nuclear families (child-reared
families, single parent, extended, etc.), family members or students with
AIDS/HIV, and illiteracy. The teachers repeat they do not have the practical
strategies to help their students, they do not even have the useful assessments
to identify students. The lack of assessments is partially due to the fact that
the teachers are required to teach to the government issued workbooks and
readers (which I found out do not always correspond to each other). They have
to complete reports on how the students are progressing with the lessons and
because the lessons don’t always compliment each other, this is a daunting task-
not to mention it takes the creativity out of teaching, much like the scripted
texts we have in the United States.
Eric, Me, and Walter at Griffin |
On Saturday,
I took Maxime to Neighborgoods and we enjoyed South African cuisine (vegetarian
option from one stall and the meat option from another stall). His birthday was
Sunday and he would be moving back to France on Monday- so this was our goodbye
outing away from his Hillside prison (he didn’t have a car in Jo’burg and spent
the last year confined to studying- his determination will allow him to succeed
in life, but we have been working on his social life). That night I met up with
Liemo, Caz, and Liz for a BailaAfrika Afro-Latino & Kizomba Party at Casa
De Galinha. They started with a Kizomba lesson (always helpful). My friends
Mawunda, Rose, and Melanie just happened to be there too. The night passed away
before I knew it…
June 23- Agata’s last day before she moved back to Italy. We
went to Café de la Crème for breakfast. She left for the airport and I chilled
at my apartment. Well, by chilled I mean I read novels, worked on qualitative
data analysis, and listened to music. While I was working John Coltrane’s
“Dahomey Dance” came on my itunes. I thought to myself, Johannesburg has got to
have live jazz somewhere. So I googled, “Johanesburg, Jazz, June 23” and the
first thing that came up was a jazz concert at Wits music hall starting in 20
minutes. I sent a message to my Liemo to see if she wanted to join me…and she
replied she was already there and would save me a seat. On the double-billed
event were Malcolm Braff Trio and Jazzwerstatt Quartet. The first group was
playing when I arrived…and within seconds I was on the edge of my seat. The
drummer and pianist stole the show, but the stand up bass and horn section was
fantastic as well. I am officially part of the Kesivan Naidoo fan club.
Evidently, he won a national talent show for his drumming skills and has only
improved his art since then.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home